True Crime Documentary Case Notes: Murder in Monaco, The Cult Behind the Killer, Evil Influencer, & My Nightmare Stalker
- The Emerald Sleuth
- 3 days ago
- 7 min read
Case Notes is a collection of quick impressions from the true crime documentaries I’ve been watching recently. These aren’t deep-dive reviews, but focused impressions meant to answer a simple question: is this worth your time, fine as background noise, or better left unwatched. Each title below includes a short assessment and a reader poll, so you can weigh in with your own verdict.
This Week's True Crime Documentary Case Notes:
Murder In Monaco
Netflix · Released Dec 17, 2025 · Runtime: 1h 30m
Note: This section discusses the documentary’s structure and conclusions without detailing key evidence or outcomes.
Murder in Monaco investigates the 1999 penthouse fire and death of billionaire banker Edmond Safra, centering on the conviction of his nurse, Ted Maher, while opening the door to competing accounts, elite power dynamics, and lingering conspiracy theories tied to Safra’s inner circle. The story unfolds with clarity and momentum, avoiding convoluted detours despite the sheer number of moving parts involved.
The documentary benefits from disciplined execution. At ninety minutes, there is no padding and no unnecessary rehashing. Interviews are purposeful, official records are used to ground claims, and the film is transparent about who is present and who is not. Maher is given space to tell his version of events, while figures who knew Lily Safra provide context in her absence. The result feels balanced without pretending neutrality where it doesn’t exist.
Where the film excels is in how it handles uncertainty. Competing theories are presented, tested against each other, and interrogated as far as available evidence allows. No single explanation is endorsed. Instead, the film mirrors the reality of the case itself: a tangle of testimony, contradictions, and power, where definitive answers may be permanently out of reach.
Stylistically, the documentary leans into a polished, almost caper-like aesthetic that suits its subject. The wealth, eccentricity, and outsized personalities involved make the story feel unreal, as if lifted from fiction, yet the tone doesn't turn playful. News footage and archival material are used effectively, adding texture rather than distraction. Edmond Safra himself is not lost in the spectacle; the film takes care to establish him as a human presence, not just a catalyst for scandal.
From a saturation standpoint, this story feels largely untouched. There is no sense of retreading familiar ground, and the documentary benefits from that freshness. Everything moves quickly, rewards close attention, and relies on its visuals as much as its testimony.
VERDICT: Watch it. This isn’t background noise. The pacing, structure, and visuals demand focus, and the story has a way of pulling you in whether you planned on it or not.
Murder In Monaco - What's your verdict?
Watch It
Background Noise
Skip It
The Cult Behind the Killer: The Andrea Yates Story
Investigation Discovery · Released Jan 6, 2026 · 3 episodes
Note: This Case Note discusses the documentary’s structure and thematic conclusions without detailing specific evidence or episode-level developments.
More than two decades after the Andrea Yates case entered public consciousness, The Cult Behind the Killer revisits the tragedy with a specific thesis: that Yates’s severe mental illness was intensified by a rigid, fear-based religious belief system that exerted prolonged control over her life. While the case itself is highly saturated, this angle represents a meaningful shift from earlier coverage that focused primarily on the act rather than the conditions surrounding it.
The series builds its case carefully. Court records, medical history, hospitalizations, Andrea Yates’s writings, and extensive audio/video from preacher Michael Woroniecki establish a pattern of psychological pressure rooted in apocalyptic doctrine. Former followers describe parallel experiences of grooming, isolation, and fear that mirror what unfolded inside the Yates household. The evidence presented makes the “cult” framing feel earned rather than rhetorical.
Where the documentary distinguishes itself is in its handling of mental illness. Postpartum psychosis is not treated as a footnote or an afterthought. Andrea is shown as actively hallucinating, hearing voices, and genuinely believing her children’s souls were in danger. That context, combined with the belief that salvation had a ticking clock, reframes the case in a way that earlier documentaries largely failed to do.
Rusty Yates’s (Andrea's husband at the time) participation adds new material but remains largely unchallenged. His interviews are presented as personal testimony rather than interrogation, leaving viewers to draw their own conclusions about his awareness, decision-making, and responsibility as Andrea’s condition deteriorated. The series does not push back on him directly, which may feel like a missed opportunity for some viewers.
Structurally, the series struggles with repetition. At three episodes, the material stretches thin. Identical footage and interview snippets recur, and thematic points are restated more than once. Occasional stylistic excess, particularly heavy music and graphics during discussions of the cult's teachings, competes with interview audio and undercuts the otherwise restrained tone.
From a saturation standpoint, this is familiar ground with an important addition. Viewers well-versed in the Andrea Yates case will recognize much of the narrative, but the sustained focus on cult influence and postpartum psychosis adds enough new context to justify its existence.
VERDICT: Background noise. The information is worthwhile, but the pacing and repetition make it difficult to justify full visual attention. Tightened to two episodes, this likely would have landed as a clear watch.
The Cult Behind the Killer- What's your verdict?
Watch It
Background Noise
Skip it
Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story
Netflix · Released Dec 30, 2025 · Runtime: 1h 40m
Note: This Case Note discusses the documentary’s structure and thematic conclusions without detailing specific evidence or episode-level developments.
Evil Influencer revisits the child abuse case involving Utah therapist Jodi Hildebrandt and parenting YouTuber Ruby Franke, a story that has already been extensively documented. As a result, much of the runtime retells familiar ground, including repeated interviews, law enforcement footage, and scenes that will be immediately recognizable to viewers who have followed previous coverage.
Where the film differentiates itself is in its sustained focus on Hildebrandt’s background and pattern of behavior. Former clients and colleagues describe a long history of coercive control, family destruction, and religious absolutism tied to her counseling practice, ConneXions. While the amount of new information is limited, the added context reinforces the idea that Hildebrandt’s influence was not isolated to a single family but part of a broader, established pattern.
The documentary makes a strong case for a cult-like dynamic. Archival material, writings, and testimony depict Hildebrandt as increasingly fanatical, framing herself as a divine authority during moments of heightened fear, including the pandemic. The film handles the LDS institutional context critically but with care, avoiding blanket blame while illustrating how rigid belief structures and deference to authority created conditions where abuse could flourish.
Technically, the execution is uneven. Heavy-handed editing choices and intrusive music occasionally compete with interview audio, undercutting otherwise sober moments. The tone fluctuates between restrained and emotionally manipulative, particularly when visual effects are used to amplify tension that the material does not require.
The children remain central as victims, but the narrative also emphasizes the wider radius of harm, presenting Hildebrandt’s former clients as casualties of the same belief system. From a saturation standpoint, this is a well-worn story. Early sections feel especially redundant for viewers already familiar with the case, even as later portions add incremental insight.
VERDICT: Better as background noise. There is value here, particularly in understanding Hildebrandt’s broader influence, but repetition and uneven execution make it difficult to justify sustained attention unless this is your first exposure to the case.
Evil Influencer - What's your verdict?
Watch It
Skip It
Background Noise
My Nightmare Stalker: The Eva LaRue Story
Paramount+ · Released Nov 13, 2025 · 2 episodes · Runtime: ~1h 30m
Note: This discusses the documentary’s structure and themes without detailing specific evidence or end-stage developments.
My Nightmare Stalker chronicles actress Eva LaRue and her daughter’s twelve-year ordeal with a relentless stalker whose threats escalated into a constant state of fear, displacement, and psychological warfare. While LaRue is a public figure, the documentary never leans on celebrity. Instead, it centers on lived experience, showing how stalking operates as a long-term crime of control rather than a single event.
LaRue carries much of the narrative herself, and she does so with clarity and emotional precision. She is able to articulate not just what happened, but how each escalation reshaped her sense of safety and autonomy. Her daughter also appears, offering perspective on what it was like to grow up inside that fear as awareness deepened with age. Supporting interviews with friends and law enforcement are used effectively, adding context without diluting the victim-centered focus.
The documentary's analysis of systemic failure is especially compelling. Instead of making vague allusions to institutional flaws, it pinpoints specific breakdowns. It is demonstrated that stalking is a crime that causes significant harm while falling into legal blind spots, where action is frequently postponed until violence is about to occur. The movie demonstrates how the family was frequently left vulnerable by procedural inertia and jurisdictional restrictions.
Despite the seriousness of the threats depicted, the series maintains a grounded and restrained tone. There isn't any sensational score vying for attention, nor is there any forced dramatization. The intensity comes entirely from the material itself. Archival footage and interviews are used with care, allowing the story to unfold without embellishment.
From a saturation standpoint, this is fresh ground. The case is not over-documented, and the structure respects the viewer’s time. The focus is sustained and the emotional weight is heavy but absorbing rather than exhausting.
VERDICT: Watch it. This is a compelling, well-constructed account of stalking as a prolonged crime, elevated by clear storytelling, strong supporting interviews, and a refusal to minimize psychological harm.
My Nightmare Stalker - What's Your Verdict?
Watch It
Skip It
Background Noise
That wraps this set of Case Notes. These true crime documentary case notes are meant to help you decide what earns your full attention, what works as background noise, and what’s better left unwatched. As always, the verdicts reflect my read, not the final word; check the polls, compare notes, and weigh the evidence for yourself.
For a complete look at what else is currently out, the January Surveillance Report breaks down recent true crime releases by date and platform.
Until next time,
